For Compliance and Investigations¶
Separate evidence from attribution, preserve timelines, and make escalation decisions explainable. Do not overclaim certainty from one source.
30 / 60 / 90-day path¶
| Window | What to do | Evidence to keep |
|---|---|---|
| 30 days | Define acceptable evidence for scam, phishing, sanctions, abuse, and wallet-drainer reviews. | Evidence policy, source list, case template, retention rule. |
| 60 days | Connect public report sources, transaction traces, domain observations, and partner escalation paths. | Case records, wallet graph notes, domain snapshots, escalation log. |
| 90 days | Review false positives, delayed escalation, repeated abuse patterns, and automation candidates. | Metrics, lessons learned, improved playbooks. |
Must-read pages¶
- Compliance and investigations resources
- Incident response resources
- SOC and incident response
- Offchain security
Checklists to use first¶
First 10 resources¶
- Chainabuse
- DefiLlama hacks
- MetaMask eth-phishing-detect
- BlockSec Phalcon simulator
- Tenderly docs
- TRM Labs
- Chainalysis
- Elliptic
- zeroShadow
- DigiBastion Threat Intel
Common failure¶
Investigations can mix confidence levels. Record source, timestamp, collection method, confidence, action taken, and unresolved assumptions for every claim.